Here’s a stark reality check: Former President Joe Biden, at 82, is battling an aggressive form of prostate cancer that has spread to his bones. But here’s where it gets even more intense—his treatment now includes both radiation and hormone therapy, a regimen that underscores the seriousness of his condition. According to Biden’s aide, Kelly Scully, this is part of a comprehensive plan to tackle the disease, which was diagnosed after he left office in January.
Biden’s health struggles come on the heels of a tumultuous political exit. He dropped his reelection bid six months before leaving office, following a widely criticized debate performance against Donald Trump, which reignited concerns about his age, health, and mental acuity. Trump went on to defeat Kamala Harris, Biden’s former vice president, in the 2024 election.
And this is the part most people miss—Biden’s prostate cancer is graded as a 9 on the Gleason score, a scale that ranges from 6 to 10. A score of 9 places his cancer among the most aggressive forms, making his treatment all the more critical. The diagnosis came after he reported urinary symptoms, and in May, his office revealed the cancer had metastasized to his bones.
Adding to his health challenges, Biden underwent surgery last month to remove skin cancer lesions from his forehead. This dual battle against cancer raises questions about the long-term impact of his health on his post-presidency life and public legacy.
Here’s the controversial angle: While Biden’s transparency about his health is commendable, it also sparks debate about the age and fitness of political leaders. Should there be stricter health standards for candidates, especially those running for the highest office? And how much should a leader’s health influence public perception of their ability to govern?
As Biden continues his treatment, his story serves as a powerful reminder of the human side of leadership. It also invites us to reflect on broader questions about aging, health, and the demands of public service. What’s your take? Do you think age and health should be more rigorously scrutinized in politics? Let’s hear your thoughts in the comments.
